One of our members and a gentleman whom I’ve known for some time now had a victory in court today. I personally congratulate him for his success and post in his own words what happened and how he achieved it for your entertainment and reading pleasure.
Peace and Prosperity,
Rob
So this all started a month ago when I went to my first hearing about this charge for breaking a by-law of the transport act 2000.
I went in there stated my name date of birth then I was asked my address,
I stated ‘you may address me as master’
Clerk ‘no Mr Harrison where do you live’
Me ‘within my body’
Clerk ‘Mr Harrison if you’re going to be belligerent then….
Me ‘if that’s belligerent that’s your opinion’
Clerk ‘do you live at 11 tie green close, town, city, postcode’
Me ‘I don’t live in your society but u may send contacts to that address’
Clerk ‘how do you plead guilty or not guilty’
Me ‘before I plead anything I want to get some clarity on matters’
‘There is a presumption by the prosecution that this law namely ‘the transport act 2000′ applies to me, I’m asking for some evidence to prove this presumption’
Clerk ‘this law applies to everyone’
Me ‘who’s everyone, does it apply to the queen? The pope? An indigenous person from Peru?
Clerk ‘ everyone within England and Wales’
Me ‘when u say England and Wales what do u mean?’ Do you mean the society of England and wales?
Clerk ‘I don’t know what u mean society has nothing to do with it.’
Me ‘really? You can’t mean the land mass how does the land mass of England and Wales have rules? Was the transport act in effect when dinosaurs were around?
Clerk ‘OK this law has been given royal accent by the queen’
Me ‘I don’t care if it’s been given a papal bull by the pope, how does it apply to me, show me evidence I’m in this society/corporation call England and Wales and that the transport applies to me, as I’m not going to take your word for it.
Clerk ‘Mr Harrison the law applies because the law applies’
Me ‘you’re giving me circular logic that doesn’t make sense’
Magistrate ‘Mr Harrison we are going around in circles’
Me ‘thank you! I know we are because you lot keep giving me circular logic!’
Clerk ‘Mr Harrison how do you plea?’
Me ‘if I plea either way it’s an admission that the this law applies to me so why would I do that of I’ve not been provided evidence of jurisdiction yet?
Clerk ‘Mr Harrison I’m going to enter a plea of not guilty
Me ‘that fine as long as you are aware that an act not done me is not my act and that you will be liable for that act, so you can pay the fine. I’m happy to pay anything I may owe so long as you can provide me with evidence it applies’
Silence for a minute….. The fuckers didn’t know what to do
Clerk ‘I’ve entered a plea of not guilty and the trial is set for 27th July
Magistrate ‘Mr Harrison you have entered a plea of not guilty…..
Me ‘ I haven’t entered any such plea….’
More silence….
Magistrate ….. Well your plea is not guilty and the trial is set for 27th of July u may leave’
So it was after this hearing I sent a notice to the prosecution
Mr David Taylor (Prosecutor)
Prosecutions unit, Abelio Greater Anglia Ltd
Unit 2/3 Ridgeway Office Park
Bedford Road
Petersfield, GU32 3QFNOTICE TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE
Date: 29th June 2015
Further to the hearing on the 22nd of June 2015 you are notified that I require full, complete, certain and not misleading disclosure, including but not limited to the specific document(s) or other empirical evidence that prove I am obligated to perform under the Transport Act 2000 and more specifically that I was obligated to perform under the Transport Act 2000 at the time of the alleged offence, which gave rise to your claim. As I’m sure you are aware the burden of proof always rests upon the claimant.
I must warn you that making a false claim is punishable criminally under the Fraud Act 2006, and carries a maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment, and that if you proceed to the so called ‘trial’ without providing me any evidence of jurisdiction I will notify the relevant authority’s and also file a civil claim against you in your private capacity.
If you realise you do not have any evidence of jurisdiction and have made a mistake in claiming you do, you have my word I will not pursue any civil claim against you and will not alert the authorities, if you withdraw your claim before the so called trial date on the 27th of July 2015. This withdrawal must be made in writing to me at the address below and must reach me three (3) days before the so called trial date of the 27th July 2015.
All documents and other empirical evidence of the proof of jurisdiction must be provided within ten (10) working days from the date of this notice, to allow me to go through them before the so called ‘trial’ on the 27th of July.
Definitions: all words in this notice are to be defined using a standard Oxford dictionary.
You may contact me at: 11 Roe Green Close, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9PD
Signed
Matthew Harrisonman
So then I was sent a letter saying the hearing was adjourned for me to seek legal aid…. Not the original trial that was said in the hearing…. Very strange
The prosecution jumps up and says that the witness they were supposed to get for the trial today couldn’t make it and that they did write to the court to postpone the trial but didn’t hear anything back so they are going to drop all the charges
awesome!