Show Cause Demanded on Drug Raid

Please click the picture to read the story I’m referring to in this article.

Apparently reports are coming in that I know the un-named adults in this situation.  I am not publicly stating an opinion on the situation nor do I have any confirmation as to the people involved, however, if I do know them they were school mates of my children.

What I find very interesting about this story is that it is extremely short and that there is a “show cause” hearing over the incident.  Apparenlty some young adult was listening to my audio of how I defeated a “Drive While Suspend” charge just 2 days before his disappearance.   Then this report came out from the local media.  It may be the young adult I knew through my children.

What I find interesting is that I’ve never seen a drug possession and traffic charge go to a “show cause” hearing before, ever.  If this is the same youth and IF he plays his cards correctly then the prosecutor will not only have to prove jurisdiction but also that the justice who signed the search warrant had the authority to order a search into a private residence to search for drugs.  They will also have to prove beyond that that they have any authority to press the alleged charges.

Now I can’t at this time confirm anything beyond that I’ve been sent this link to the story and the person who sent it believes it to be a young man that I know.  That said I am very interested and wanting to know what happens at the hearing and IF the prosecution can provide any evidence of their authority here.  This could be one for the record should the hearing find that there is no “cause of action” and thus no grounds for the charges or the unlawful search and seizure.

The facts here are that the principles I use to win in traffic court also apply to more serious charges as well.  I use this analogy, if you know how to catch a 1 pound trout the methods to catch a 300 pound shark are the same.  The difference is in the fight of your opponent.  If this is the young man I’m led to suspect it is then he has a good fight ahead of him.  He has, however, started with a strong opposing challenge.

This is one to follow for sure and I’ll keep all advised as to what happens.  I’m not a proponent of chemical drugs of any kind including the ones pushed by doctors.  Despite that I see no reason why someone who wishes to utilize them should be punished for non-violent “crimes”.  There were no weapons and no violence over this incident.  It’s merely an assault on a business selling products that an alleged “government” doesn’t want sold on this geographical location.  Is that reason for a prison term?  Not in my opinion.  I’m cheering for the charged on this one and hope they can succeed with forcing the prosecution to withdraw due to “lack of cause” as we all know they don’t have any.

I’d like to hear what you have to say on this one so please comment and let me know.

Rob