by Judge Dale, retired
Thursday, 11 April 2013
Our federal government has instructed our federal, state and local police agencies that everyone who purports to be a SOVEREIGN should be TREATED as a TERRORIST! They have also brainwashed the American public into believing that being a SOVEREIGN is anti-American and unpatriotic! Perhaps this is “The POT calling the KETTLE black”?
WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY? It is the inherent right and prerogative of a civilized people to rule itself, and to dictate all of the forms and conditions of the institutions it sets up to carry out this rule. Ironically, the U.S. SUPREME COURT agrees with those people who claim to be SOVEREIGN citizens of the American Republic!
- Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 – 2000, The Supreme Court held that the American People are in fact Sovereign and not the States or the Government. The court went on to define that local, state and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful actions against the Sovereign People by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their actions.
- Bond v. United States, 529 US 334 – 2000 – Supreme Court –Cited by 761 litigants in other cases.
- Bond v. US, 131 S. Ct. 2355 – 2011 – Supreme Court – Cited by 306 “ “Bond v. US, 1 F. 3d 631 – 1993 – Court of Appeals, 7th – Cited by66 “ “
What are the implications of this 2000, U.S. Supreme Court ruling?
1] The delegates to the first Federal Convention prohibited the use ofcorporations by all governments representing the American Republic. Therefore, all of these corporate governments and their corporate laws are a usurpation of the organic Constitution of the United States of America. All State Governments are now sub-corporations of the Federal Government, making all Courts and all law enforcement personnel, corporate federal agencies or employees. (See: James Madison Journal of the Federal Convention, Vol. 2, P.722) and (Pull up your State Code on your PC and search the Code for the words “District of Columbia” and “Federal Government.” You will receive about 1000 references linking your state to the federal government.)
2] The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, State Legislatures, City Councils, Municipalities and all State and Federal Courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of government.
3] Corporations are privately owned businesses, meaning that the Corporate United States belongs to one or more private individuals, which is always governed by a Board of Directors. The Corporate United States is privately owned by a group of European Royal and Elite individuals tied to the Federal Reserve System and the letters of incorporation are recorded in the Vatican. The President of the United States is actually the CEO of the United States and the Congress and all others are corporate employees. Everything they do is in the interest of the corporate owners! I can’t access those documents because of National Security.
4] In order to promulgate and enforce Criminal Laws to govern the SOVEREIGN public, government must be SOVEREIGN too, which is an accepted RULE of LAW derived from the, Ancient Law of Kings. Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real; they are a fiction and only exist on paper.
5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do!
6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations?
[Citations and Complaints are contracts but they lack transparency because you were never told what might happen to you if you agree to contract, and that you had a right to refuse the accommodation!]
7] Do any of Americas Courts have Jurisdiction over a SOVEREIGN? Yes … but only by your consent to be judged by the Court. Can they compel [Summon or Subpoena] you to appear or participate in their process? No … they can’t compel you and Yes … they can ask but you can reject the accommodation in writing and nothing can be done about it because you have refused to give the court jurisdiction over you!
8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful action s being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bank v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
9] There being no Constitutional Criminal Laws or Transparency in the American Justice System, everyone arrested, convicted and sentenced to prison under these CIVIL LAWS are in prison by CONSENT and therein, all American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!
10] Most of the County and State Prisons and all of the Federal Prisons are privately owned corporate businesses for profit, which kick back to the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch provides general oversight, for these institutions. So if you are convicted in these Courts, you can expect to serve some jail time! Now you know why America has such high prison populations!
11] Can the State Government and Courts take Custody of your children? Only with your consent, otherwise their agents and officers can be held personally liable for their actions! Orphans are a different matter and can become wards of the Court until emancipated.
Corporate governments are a usurpation of the organic American Constitution and this corporatist onslaught in America has since its creation, been an ANTI-SOVEREIGN and TERRORIST REGIME and are in fact the real TERRORIST and TRAITORS to the American Republic.
Blessings,
Judge Dale, retired
Link to this article: www.anticorruptionsociety.com – Judge Says USINC is just a Corporate Franchise Network
About Rob
I have over 10 years experience assisting people at looking at their problems and shifting focus so that they can begin to resolve the issues at hand. I don't "practice" psychological principles or homeopathic disciplines, I actually help real people learn how to shift their focus and see things in a different light. A light where they have the power and ability to resolve their issues practically and successfully.
Hi, i think that i noticed you visited my website so i came to return the
desire?.I’m trying to in finding things to improve my web site!I guess its adequate to make use of some of your concepts!!
Sovereignty is the result of an allegiance.
But hold the phone! Allegiance can only be between men. Not between a man and a body politic.
The following proves
-Subject is synonomuus with citizen
-Calvin’s is the highest legal authority in alligience
-Allegiance is between 2 people only.
-There can be no Allegiance to a body poltic
-The United States is a body politic
Judicial and statutory definitions of words and phrases, Volume 1
By West Publishing Company
Definition Body Politic
United States
For the purpose of receiving legacies and for many other purposes the United States is to be regarded as a body politic and corporate 1n United States v Maurice US 26 Fed Cas 1211 Chief Justice Marshall says at page 1216 The United States is a government and consequently a body politic and corporate capable of attaining the objects for which it was created by the means which are necessary for their attainment This great corporation was ordained and established by the American people and endowed by them with great powers for important purposes 1n re Merriam’s Estate 36 NE 505 506 141 NY 479
………………..
http://www.constitution.org/coke/Calvins_Case-7_Coke_Report_1a_77_ER_377.html
Calvin’s Case aka Case of the Postnati is the most comprehensive and authoritative legal analysis of allegiance.
It is cited in 700+ opinions as authority including the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark which is cited in nearly 3000 cases!
What does Calvin’s Case say about Allegiance?
2. For the laws:
a. That ligeance or obedience of the subject to the Sovereign is due by the law of nature:
b. That this law of nature is part of the laws of England:
3. That the law of nature was before any judicial or municipal law in the world:,
4. That the law of nature is immutable, and cannot be changed.
…..
There is found in the law four kinds of ligeances; the first is, ligeantia naturalis, absoluta pura, et indefinite, and this originally is due by nature and birth-right, and is called alta ligeantia, and he that oweth this is called subditus natus.
The second is called ligeantia acquisita, not by nature but by acquisition or denization, being called a denizen, or rather donaizon, because he is subditus datus.
The third is, ligeantia localis, wrought by the law; and that is when an alien that is in amity cometh into England, because as long as he is within England, he is within the King’s protection; therefore so long as he is here, he oweth unto the King a local obedience or ligeance, for that the one (as it hath been said) draweth the other.
The fourth is a legal obedience, or ligeance which is called legal, because the municipal laws of this realm have prescribed the order and form of it; and this to be done upon oath at the torn of the leet.
…..
But between the Sovereign and the subject there is without comparison a higher and greater connexion: for as the subject oweth to the King his true and faithful ligeance and obedience, so the Sovereign is to govern and protect his subjects
…..
First- every subject (as it hath been affirmed by those that argued against the plaintiff) is presumed by law to be sworn to the King, which is to his natural person, and likewise the King is sworn to his subjects, (as it appeareth in Bracton, lib. 3. de Actionibus, cap. 9. fol. 107) which oath he taketh in his natural [1 0 b] person: for the politic capacity is invisible and immortal; nay, the politic body hath no soul, for it is framed by the policy of man. 2. In all indictments of treason, when any do intend or compass mortem et destructionem domini Regis (which must needs be understood of his natural body, for his politic body is immortal, and not subject to death,)
…..
……………………………………………..
The coup d’gras
A citizen is a freeman who has kept family in the city Roy v Hanger 1 Rolle 138 149 The term citizen as in our law is precisely analogous to term subject in the common law and change of phrases has entirely resulted the change of government The has been changed from one man to a collective body of people and he who before was subject of the king is now a citizen of state Citizens under our Constitution laws means free inhabitants born within United States or naturalized under the of Congress United States v Rhodes 27 Fed Cas 7S5 788 citing 1 Kent Comm 292 note
A (c) body politic (being invisible) can as a body politic neither make or take homage: Vide 33 H. 8. tit. Fealty, Brook 15. 5. In fide, in faith or ligeance nothing ought to be feigned, but ought to be ex fide non ficta.